Japanese (language)

Aug. 1, article from the Ministry of Justice.

　The Ministry of Justice has issued guidelines on the issue of whether using AI to provide services to solve legal problems is contrary to so-called "non-bengoshi activities" (Article 72 of the Lawyers Act).

As a point of view,

1 Is a counterparty relationship recognized?

2 Can it be said to be a legal case?

3 Can it be considered an "appraisal"?

These factors need to be considered. For more information, please visit the Ministry of Justice website.

We need to know that AI extends to the field of law. AI is able to draw information from vast amounts of historical data, and lawyers are able to solve individual, specific cases by mobilizing all of their thinking to solve the problem.

Which would you choose?

English

Article from the Ministry of Justice on August 1

"https://www.moj.go.jp/housei/shihouseido/housei10_00134.html"

"About the provision of contract-related business support services using AI, etc. and the relationship with Article 72 of the Attorney Law "

The Ministry of Justice has released guidelines on the issue that providing services to solve legal problems using AI may be against so-called "non-representative activities" (Lawyer Law Article 72).

From a point of view, the

1. Will a compensation relationship be recognized?
2. Can it be said that it constitutes a legal case?
3. Can it be called "appraisal"?

For details, please see the website of the Ministry of Justice.

We need to know that AI extends into the legal arena as well. AI that can extract information from a huge amount of past data, lawyers who try to solve problems by mobilizing all thoughts for individual and specific cases.

Which one would you choose?